论文部分内容阅读
2015年年底以前进行的司法领域授权改革试点工作,主要有四种情形:司法机关授权试点、全国人大常委会授权试点、中央全面深化改革领导小组批准试点以及中央全面深化改革领导小组批准后由全国人大常委会授权试点。这些试点工作在授权主体、授权方式、授权程序以及试点成果评估等方面存在较大的差别。推动司法改革试点工作的规范化,就要用法治思维和法治方式来厘清不同授权形式之间的差别,明确授权的主体,进行具体授权,明确试点突破现有法律的地方,并采取开门试点的方式,以打消社会疑虑,推动改革共识的形成。改革成果的评估,应以是否能够让人民群众在每一个案件中感受到公平正义为评判标准,并引进中立第三方、诉讼参与人等作为评估的主体之一。建议中央相关部门在尊重司法规律的基础上,不断推动授权改革试点的立法工作,处理好改革与法治的关系。
There are mainly four situations in which the pilot reform of the authorization work in the judicial field was conducted before the end of 2015: the pilot authorization by the judiciary, the pilot authorization by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, the approval of the pilot by the leading group for comprehensively deepening the reform of the Central Government and the approval of the leading group for comprehensively deepening reform by the Central Government. The NPC Standing Committee authorized the pilot. There is a big difference between these pilot projects in the aspects of authorization subject, authorization method, authorization procedure and assessment of pilot achievement. To standardize the pilot reform of judicial reform, we should make use of the rule of law and the rule of law to clarify the differences between different forms of authorization, clarify the main body of authorization, make specific authorization, clearly identify areas where existing laws are to be exceeded, and adopt a pilot mode , To dispel social doubts and promote the formation of a consensus on reform. The assessment of the outcome of the reform should be based on whether the people can feel the fairness and justice in every case as the criterion and introduce neutral third parties and litigators as one of the subjects of the assessment. It is suggested that the relevant central government departments, on the basis of respecting the laws of justice, continue to push forward the legislative work of authorizing the pilot reform and handle the relationship between reform and the rule of law.