论文部分内容阅读
德里达的解构主义是20世纪下半叶以来在世界范围内争论最多、关注最广的文学和哲学理论之一。解构思想的诞生撼动了几千年根深蒂固的西方传统形而上学的“在场”中心论。解构主义的出发点是西方的经典文本,德里达引用西方哲学史上最有代表性的经典文本,将它们作为他思想的源头和研究的对象。从柏拉图的《斐德若篇》(Phaedrus)到海德格尔的《存在与时间》(SeinundZeit),德里达一步步地构造了一套由不同的新概念相互交叉、相互说明的解构思想。这种蜘蛛网型的解构思想,制造了一个西方形而上学思想传统及其代表性经典无法逃出的陷阱。德里达通过他本人创造的新概念如原始书写、延异、踪迹等攻击了西方形而上学的语音中心主义思想,为几千年受敌视的“书写”(文字)重新定位。由此可知,“书写”概念在德里达解构思想中所占的地位。那么,这种以“书写”(文字)问题作为基础的解构思想,在非西方世界是如何被解读的?本文试图通过这个概念在非西方世界的解读,探索德里达解构思想在非西方世界的影响和接受。
Derrida’s deconstructionism is one of the most controversial and widespread literature and philosophical theories in the world since the second half of the 20th century. The birth of deconstruction has shaken thousands of years of deeply rooted “metaphysics” of western traditional metaphysics. The starting point of deconstruction is the classic text of the West. Derrida quotes the most representative classic texts in the history of western philosophy as the source and target of his thought. From Plato’s Phaedrus to Heidegger’s Seinund Zeit, Derrida constructed step by step a set of deconstructive ideas that were intersected and illustrated by different new concepts. This spider web deconstruction idea has created a trap that can not be escaped by the tradition of Western metaphysics and its representative classics. Derrida has attacked Western metaphysical philocentrism through new concepts he has created, such as primitive writing, divergence and traces, and has repositioned the “writing” (writing) hostile to the world for thousands of years. From this we can see, “writing ” concept in Derrida deconstruction thought occupy the position. So how does this kind of deconstruction based on the “writing” (writing) problem be interpreted in the non-western world? This article tries to explore the non-Western deconstruction idea of Derrida through this concept in the non-Western world Influence and acceptance of the world.