“反训”问题自东晋郭璞提出以来,学术界一直争议不断,至今仍未能就其中的争议问题达成共识。“反训”这一术语是否成立,是争论的首要焦点。本文通过对“反训”称名源头、立名依据、定名历史等问题进行考述和清理,论证“反训”作为一个训诂术语是不恰当的、不科学的,甚至是荒谬的。 Since the introduction of Guo Pu in the Eastern Jin Dynasty, academics have been constantly debating controversy and still have not reached a consensus on the controversial issues. Whether the term “anti-training” is true or not is the primary focus of the debate. This article examines and cleans up such issues as the source of the title of “anti-training”, the establishment of the name, the history of nominalization, and the demonstration that “anti-training” as an exegetical term is inappropriate, unscientific, and even absurd .