Colorectal cancer screening: Comparison of transferrin and immuno fecal occult blood test

来源 :World Journal of Gastroenterology | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:fclhp
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
AIM: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of transfesrrin dipstick test (Tf) in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and precancerous lesions screening. METHODS: Eight hundreds and sixty-one individuals at high-risk for CRC were recruited. Six hundreds and eleven subsequently received the three fecal occult blood tests and colonoscopy with biopsy performed as needed. Fecal samples were obtained on the day before colonoscopy. Tf, immuno fecal occult blood test (IFOBT) and guaiac fecal occult blood test (g-FOBT) were performed simultaneously on the same stool. To minimize false-negative cases, all subjects with negative samples were asked to provide an additional stool specimen for a second test even a third test. If the results were all negative after testing three repeated samples, the subject was considered a true negative. The performance characteristics of Tf for detecting CRC and precancerous lesions were examined and compared to those of IFOBT and the combination of Tf, IFOBT and g-FOBT. RESULTS: A total of six hundreds and eleven subjects met the study criteria including 25 with CRC and 60 with precancerous lesions. Sensitivity for detecting CRC was 92% for Tf and 96% for IFOBT, specificities of Tf and IFOBT were both 72.0% (95% CI: 68.2%-75.5%; χ2 = 0.4, P > 0.05); positive likelihood ratios of those were 3.3 (95% CI: 2.8-3.9) and 3.4 (95% CI: 2.9-4.0), respectively. In precancerous lesions, sensitivities for Tf and IFOBT were 50% and 58%, respectively (χ 2 = 0.8, P > 0.05); specificities of Tf and IFOBT were 71.5% (95% CI: 67.6%-75.1%) and 72.2% (95% CI: 68.4%-75.8%); positive likelihood ratios of those were 1.8 (95% CI: 1.3-2.3) and 2.1 (95% CI: 1.6-2.7), respectively; compared to IFOBT, g-FOBT+ Tf+ IFOBT had a significantly higher positive rate for precancerous lesions (83% vs 58%, respectively; χ 2 = 9.1, P < 0.05). In patients with CRC and precancerous lesions, the sensitivities of Tf and IFOBT were 62% and 69% (χ 2 = 0.9, P > 0.05); specificities of those were 74.5% (95% CI: 70.6%-78.1%) and 75.5% (95% CI: 71.6%-79.0%); positive likelihood ratios of those were 2.5 (95% CI: 2.0-3.1) and 2.8 (95% CI: 2.3-3.5). Compared to IF-OBT alone, combining g-FOBT, IFOBT and Tf led to significantly increased sensitivity for detecting CRC and cancerous lesions (69% vs 88%, respectively; χ 2 = 9.0, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Tf dipstick test might be used as an ad- ditional tool for CRC and precancerous lesions screening in a high-risk cohort. AIM: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of transfesrrin dipstick test (Tf) in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and precancerous lesions screening. METHODS: Eight hundreds and sixty-one individuals at high-risk for CRC were recruited. Six hundreds and eleven received the three fecal occult blood tests and colonoscopy with biopsy performed as needed. Fecal samples were obtained on the day before colonoscopy. Tf, immuno fecal occult blood test (IFOBT) and guaiac fecal occult blood test (g-FOBT) were performed simultaneously on the same stool. To minimize false-negative cases, all subjects with negative samples were asked to provide an additional stool specimen for a second test even a third test. If the results were all negative after testing three repeated samples, the subject was considered a true negative. The performance characteristics of Tf for detecting CRC and precancerous lesions were examined and compared to those of IFOBT and the combination of Tf, IFOBT and g-FOBT. RESULTS: A total of six hundreds and eleven subjects met the study criteria including 25 with CRC and 60 with precancerous lesions. Sensitivity for detecting CRC was 92% for Tf and 96% for IFOBT, specificities of Tf and IFOBT were both were 72.0% (95% CI: 68.2% -75.5%; χ2 = 0.4, P> 0.05); positive likelihood ratios of those were 3.3 , respectively. The specificities of Tf and IFOBT were 71.5% (95% CI: 67.6% -75.1%), respectively and 72.2% (95% CI: 68.4% -75.8%); positive likelihood ratios of those were 1.8 (95% CI: 1.3-2.3) and 2.1 -FOBT + Tf + IFOBT had a significantly higher positive rate for precancerous lesions (83% vs 58% respectively; χ 2 = 9.1, P <0.05). In patients with CRC and precancerous lesions, the sensitivities of Tf and IFOBT were 62% and 69% (χ 2 = 0.9, P> 0.05); specificitie s ofthose were 74.5% (95% CI: 70.6% -78.1%) and 75.5% (95% CI: 71.6% -79.0%); positive likelihood ratios of those were 2.5 % CI: 2.3-3.5). Compared to IF-OBT alone, combining g-FOBT, IFOBT and Tf led to greatly increased sensitivity for detecting CRC and cancerous lesions (69% vs 88%, respectively; 0.05). CONCLUSION: Tf dipstick test might be used as an ad- ditional tool for CRC and precancerous lesions screening in a high-risk cohort.
其他文献
一、贷款向新经济增长点转移的理论背景分析 1、深圳市面临的日益严峻的市场环境要求商业银行贷款向新经济增长点转移 进入90年代中期,深圳速度得以长期维持的支撑点发生了
会议
会议
会议
会议
时下杭州的广播听众已经有十几个电台可供选择。从传播学的角度看,听觉的刺激是吸引听众的一个重要因素。比如听众选择或更换电台,基本上是在听 Nowadays there are more th
专家指出,夏天是急性胃肠炎的多发季节。由于气温高、湿度大,食物易腐败、变质,一不小心让细菌、病毒侵入胃肠容易患上急性胃肠炎,病人多表现为恶心、呕吐在先,继而腹泻,每日
孟子称孔子是“圣之时者也”(《孟子·万章上》).对于世界大宗教和哲理的创始者们而言,这种赞评是极罕见的.孟子善于讲道德、说仁义,却以“时”作为孔子及儒家的点睛之处,说
期刊