论文部分内容阅读
同一事实因法官自由裁量权的行使,法律适用的不同导致不同案件的不同判决结果,从而导致一定程度的不公正。文章以个别案例的视角,运用已学的法学知识,对2009年修订的《中华人民共和国保险法》以及《最高人民法院关于适用<中华人民共和国保险法>若干问题的解释(一)》(法释【2009】12号),在司法实践活动中带来新、旧保险法适用的争议做出有益的理论探讨。
The same fact, due to the exercise of the discretion of the judge, led to a certain degree of injustice due to the differences in the application of law resulting in different judgments in different cases. The article uses the learned jurisprudence knowledge from individual case perspectives to review the “Insurance Law of the People’s Republic of China” amended in 2009 and the Interpretations of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Insurance Law of the People’s Republic of China (Laws and Regulations [ 2009] No.12), and made useful theoretical discussions on the issues that the new and old insurance laws bring to judicial practice.