论文部分内容阅读
传统的理论对法律规避的定义大多是涉外民商事关系的当事人为利用某一冲突规范,故意制造某种连接点,以避开本应适用的法律,从而使对自己有利的法律得以适用的一种逃法或脱法行为。然而在意思自治原则在国际私法领域日益重要的今天来看,规避法律是否也有其合理性呢?或者说在自由主义的乌托邦中实在认为法律规避没有继续存在的必要。但我仍愿为此发声并祈愿它能被听见。
The traditional theory of legal avoidance is mostly defined as the relationship between civil and commercial parties to the use of a conflict of laws and regulations, deliberately create a connection point to avoid the law should be applicable, so that their own law applicable to one Kind of escape or act of withdrawal. However, at a time when the principle of autonomy of will is increasingly important in the field of private international law, whether the law is circumvented is also justified or that the liberal utopia really believes that the law avoids the necessity of not continuing. But I am still willing to voice it and pray that it will be heard.