论文部分内容阅读
欧盟法下“滥用市场支配地位”抗辩如何运用于“标准必要专利”侵权之诉的问题在“华为诉中兴”案中得到了充分体现。鉴于目前德国的“橘皮书标准案”规则自身存在不足,且其与欧盟法规则存在潜在冲突。再加之欧盟法目前尚缺乏足够明确且具有约束力的相关判例,故本案极具代表性和研究价值。本案中极可能诞生新的欧盟法规则,且这将对欧盟法“标准必要专利”侵权与反垄断强制许可抗辩问题产生重要的影响。建议新规则采取分步适用的做法,从而细化《欧盟运行条约》第102条在“标准必要专利”滥用市场支配地位方面的适用。除此之外,结合特定的政策考量,欧盟法规则对于完善我国在该领域的立法、执法和司法制度均具有良好的参考价值。
The EU law “abuse of market dominance” defense how to apply “standard essential patents ” the issue of infringement of the complaint in “Huawei v. ZTE ” case has been fully reflected. In view of the current German “Orange Book Standard ” rule itself is insufficient, and its potential conflict with the EU rules. Coupled with the current EU law is still not enough clear and binding relevant jurisprudence, so the case very representative and research value. It is highly probable that a new EU law will be born in this case and this will have a significant impact on the issue of compulsory licensing of infringement and antitrust protections by the EU law. It is suggested that the new rule take a step-by-step approach to refine the application of Article 102 of the Treaty on the Treaty on the Purposes of the EU in the abuse of market dominance. In addition, in combination with specific policy considerations, EU regulations have a good reference value for improving our country’s legislation, law enforcement and judicial system in this field.