论文部分内容阅读
2012年7月,最高院出台了《最高人民法院关于审理买卖合同纠纷案件适用法律问题的解释》,其中第3条对于无权处分的买卖合同之效力的规定从文义解释的角度来看,与合同法规定不完全契合。因此,应当进一步明确该条的适用范围,即仅仅适用于“所有权或者处分权受到限制的所有人处分自己的财产”的情形,不包括“恶意或误认处分他人财产”。从而避免司法解释与现行法律的冲突。
In July 2012, the Supreme People’s Court promulgated the “Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on the Applicable Laws in the Trial of a Dispute over the Sale and Purchase Contract”, and Article 3 of the Provisions on the Effectiveness of a Sale and Purchase Contract with No Discipline From the perspective of the textual interpretation, And the contract law does not fully fit. Therefore, the scope of the article should be further clarified, that is, it applies only to the case where “all property owners who have limited ownership or disposition rights dispose of their property”, excluding “malicious or misleading disposal of property of others.” Thus avoiding the conflict between judicial interpretation and the current law.