论文部分内容阅读
[目的 /意义]对中美两国区域图书馆联盟章程的制定现状进行比较研究,为进一步制定和完善我国图书馆联盟章程提供借鉴。[方法 /过程]通过网络调查法和内容分析法对中美两国20个区域图书馆联盟章程的制定程序、制定内容以及制定依据3方面进行对比分析,总结我国区域图书馆联盟章程制定实践中存在的不足。[结果/结论]为完善我国图书馆联盟章程的制定,应该从以下方面进行努力:联盟章程制定应坚持程序正义;联盟章程制定内容科学化;构建学习型问责机制,提升章程实施效率。
[Purpose / Significance] To make a comparative study of the status quo of making statutes of the League between China and the United States, and to provide reference for further formulation and improvement of the Articles of Association of China’s libraries. [Methods / Processes] Through the network investigation method and content analysis method, this article makes a comparative analysis of the formulation process, formulation contents and formulation basis of the 20 regional library alliance statutes of China and the United States, summarizes the practice of the formulation of the Articles of Association of regional library in our country There are deficiencies. [Result / Conclusion] In order to perfect the formulation of the constitution of library union in our country, efforts should be made in the following aspects: the establishment of alliance constitution should adhere to the procedural justice; the constitution of alliance constitution should be scientifical; the construction of learning type accountability mechanism should enhance the efficiency of the constitution implementation.