论文部分内容阅读
未能忘情自由却又在自由的迷途中,这就是当时的胡适了。当然胡适也并非一味的简单,至少他还有一点怀疑精神,同时也在打量:从新文化运动到国民革命以及这个四一二,是历史的进步,还是倒退?这个问题,要在看你从什么角度切入。如果切入点是自由主义,只需问一句:北伐后的国民政府时代和后国民政府时代,还可能再发生1917年那种诸子式的新文化运动吗?历史可以以前进的方式延伸自己,也可以以倒退的方式延伸自己。更深的问题在于,二十世纪的中国到底是以什么方式走完它的历程?如果这是作为进步论者的胡适在当时无从回答的问题,那么,这个问题在今天已经不难回答了。
In the midst of a labyrinthine freedom, this was Hu Shih. Of course, Hu Shih is not blindly simple. At least, he still has some suspicion. At the same time, he also looks into the question whether the move from the New Culture Movement to the National Revolution and this 412 is a historical advance or a retrogression. This issue depends on what you see from Cut into the angle. If the starting point is liberalism, just ask: During the era of the National Government and the post-National Government after the Northern Expedition, could the rebellion of the new cultural movement of 1917 occur again? History can extend itself in a progressive manner, You can also extend yourself backwards. The deeper question is: In the end, what did China in the twentieth century finish its course? If this was a question that Hu Shih, as a progressiveist, could not answer at the time, then the question is not difficult to answer today.