编辑：现在请您来一同讨论一下关于生物医学论文审稿的问题。审稿制度在科技界使用很广泛。一般有一个共识：某项科研成果让同一学科领域的科学家来评论其研究工作的原始性、可靠性及其价值最可靠。但这种做法也有许多不足的地方，而且苦于找不到改进的良策［１，２］。据说有 EDIT: Now I’d like to discuss with you the issue of reviewing biomedical papers. Review system is widely used in science and technology. There is generally a consensus that a research result allows scientists in the same subject area to comment on the originality, reliability, and value of their research work. However, there are still many deficiencies in this approach, and it is hard to find a good solution for improvement [1,2]. It is said that there is