论文部分内容阅读
问题的提出在讨论教材中关于去最分评价的一段材料时,课堂上一个学生举手发言:老师,我不赞同去最分评价,因为去最分评价并不科学.我说你可以挑战教材的观点,不过,你应该有令人信服的理由.这个学生回答说:多个评委对先后出场的若干个表演评分,本来每个评委的评价都是公平的,但是,给第一个表演评分后,被去掉的两个评分是因为评委一开始定的调子过
The question raised in the discussion of textbooks to the most sub-evaluation of a period of material, the classroom a student raised his hand to speak: teacher, I do not agree to the most evaluation, because to the most evaluation is not scientific. I said you can challenge the textbook However, you should have compelling reasons to answer this student’s reply: Multiple juries scored on several appearances that have been played, and each of the judges originally rated it as fair, but rated the first performance After the two scores have been removed because the judges set the tone at the beginning