论文部分内容阅读
目的初步修订中文版物质使用风险评估量表(SURPS),并评价其信度和效度,为该量表在中国的推广使用提供科学依据。方法通过双向翻译获得中文版SURPS初版量表,结合中国小学生特点初步对该初版量表的理论结构进行修订,并采用项目分析、探索性因子分子、验证性因子分析和信效度检验方法对广西壮族自治区百色市2014年3月—2015年6月抽取的3所小学共948名小学生的物质使用风险进行分析,验证该量表理论结构的合理性。结果修订后的中文版SURPS模型与原量表因子拟合指数基本达到可接受的标准,探索性因子分析结果显示,中文版SURPS量表4个公因子的累计方差贡献率为54.16%,各条目所属因子结构与原量表基本一致;验证性因子分析结果显示,χ~2/df为5.214,近似误差均方根为0.063,拟合优度指数、调整拟合优度指数、规范拟合指数、增量拟合指数分别为0.889、0.862、0.898、0.893;修订后的中文版SURPS量表具有较好的项目区分度,各条目得分与其所属维度得分的相关系数均在0.667~0.818(均P<0.001);量表总体Cronbach’sα系数和重测信度分别为0.801和0.776,感觉寻求、绝望、焦虑敏感、冲动4个维度的Cronbach’sα系数为0.698~0.811,重测信度为0.601~0.754。结论修订的中文版SURPS量表在中国小学生中的信度和效度指标均符合心理测量学的要求,可适用于我国青少年物质使用相关个体特征因素的风险评估。
Objective To revise the Chinese version of Substance Use Risk Assessment Scale (SURPS) and evaluate its reliability and validity to provide a scientific basis for the promotion and use of the scale in China. Methods The first edition of Chinese version of SURPS was obtained through two-way translation. Based on the characteristics of Chinese primary school students, the theoretical structure of the first edition was revised initially. And by project analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and reliability-validity test, The author analyzed the risk of substance use of 948 primary school students from 3 primary schools in Baise City, March 2014-June 2015, and verified the rationality of the theoretical structure of this scale. Results The revised Chinese version of the SURPS model and the original scale factor fitting index basically reached an acceptable standard. The exploratory factor analysis showed that the cumulative variance contribution rate of the four common factors in the Chinese version of SURPS was 54.16% The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the χ ~ 2 / df was 5.214, the root mean square error was 0.063, goodness of fit index, goodness of fit adjusted, normative fit index , Respectively, and the incremental fit index was 0.889,0.862,0.898,0.893 respectively. The revised Chinese version of the SURPS scale had a good degree of project differentiation, and the correlation coefficients of each item score and its respective dimension scores ranged from 0.667 to 0.818 (both P <0.001). The overall Cronbach’s α coefficient and the test-retest reliability of the scale were 0.801 and 0.776 respectively. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the four dimensions of feeling seeking, hopelessness, anxiety sensitivity and impulsivity were 0.698-0.811 and the retest reliability was 0.601 ~ 0.754. Conclusions The reliability and validity of the revised Chinese version of the SURPS scale in primary school students in China meet the requirements of psychometrics and can be applied to the risk assessment of the characteristics of individuals related to substance use in adolescents in China.