施特劳斯认为,斯宾诺莎在解读《圣经》时没有真正贯彻他提出的以经解经的原则,因为斯宾诺莎借助历史资料来解读《圣经》,引入外部原则整理《圣经》,对于《圣经》中各主题事物的定义超出了《圣经》的范围,由《圣经》本质上的不可理解性得出必须根据《圣经》理解《圣经》,并且超越《圣经》作者的本意去理解这些作者。施特劳斯的这些批评其实是对斯宾诺莎解经方法的误读。 Strauss considered Spinoza’s interpretation of the Bible as not really implementing the principle of explaining Scriptures, because Spinoza used the historical data to interpret the Bible and introduced external principles to organize the Bible. , The definition of the subject matter in the Bible is beyond the scope of the Bible. It is derived from the inherent incomprehension of the Bible that the Bible must be understood in accordance with the Bible and beyond the author’s original intention Understand these authors. These criticisms of Strauss are, in fact, a misreading of the methods used by Spinoza.