论文部分内容阅读
笔者此前曾经针对十六国时期“河西圆首碑形墓表”的源流问题进行过探讨①。在此研究中,虽然在编纂文献时检索到一些有关“墓表”的信息,但是均与“河西圆首碑形墓表”无关。然而笔者注意到,“墓表”一词虽然历史久远,但从古到今都存在概念混乱的问题。如在文献史料中出现汉魏晋南北朝时期的“墓表”多指神道石柱,而考古发掘所见“墓表”均为十六国时期北方地区出土的碑形墓志。惟有赵明诚(1081-1129)《金石录》中所录“汉谒者景君表’’为一根据碑刻实物而记录的”墓表“②,却属墓碑一类。这种混乱在今人研究中更是比比皆是,
The author had previously discussed the origins and problems of the ”Hexi Beizhen monument-shaped tomb table“ during the 16-nation period. In this study, although some information about ”Tomb Tables “ was retrieved during the compilation of the documents, it was not related to the ”Tombstone Table“ of the Hexi Corps. However, I noticed that although the term ”tomb table“ has a long history, the concept of chaos has existed since ancient times. For example, in the historical materials of the Han, Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties, the ”Tomb Table“ mostly refers to the pillars of the Shintoism, while the ”Tomb Tables“ seen in the archaeological excavations are the epitaphs unearthed in the northern part of the 16 countries. Only Zhao Mingcheng (1081-1129) ”recorded in the stone“ recorded in the ”King of Han Yi Jing Jun table“ as a basis for the inscription recorded ”tomb table" ②, but it is a tombstone .This confusion in Today’s research is abound,