论文部分内容阅读
本文采用的方法：（1）防治的费用按直接和间接两种费用估算；（2）将急性炎症发作减少作为防治效果的可测性指标；（3）在急性炎症发作减少的随访资料与双曲线方程拟合良好的基础上，用该方程估算防治后每年急性炎症发作的人数；（4）认定如不开展防治，每年急性炎症发作的人数相对地稳定在防治前水平；（5）将丝虫病人流火发作减少、增加的劳动日按当时人均劳动日的经济价值计算，加上节省的诊疗费作为效益。对费用和效益采取贴现，用费用与效益之比进行分析。结果：总费用为21182元，总效益为119859元，费用-效益比值为1：57．即每投入1元，可获5．7元的效益。
The method used in this article: (1) the cost of prevention and treatment according to both direct and indirect cost estimates; (2) reduce the incidence of acute inflammation as a measurable indicator of control effect; (3) reduction in the incidence of acute inflammation and follow-up data double (4) to determine that if the prevention and treatment is not carried out, the number of acute inflammatory attacks per year will be relatively stable at the pre-control level; (5) the silk will be used to determine the number of acute inflammation episodes per year after the prevention and treatment; The flow of pest patients decreased, the increase of labor day was calculated according to the economic value per capita working day at that time, and the saved medical expenses were taken as benefits. Discounted fees and benefits, with cost and benefit ratio analysis. Results: The total cost of 21,182 yuan, the total benefit of 119,859 yuan, the cost - benefit ratio of 1:57. That is, each invested 1 yuan, 5.7 yuan will receive benefits.