论文部分内容阅读
在分析梳理典籍文献对曹操高陵记载的基础上,通过实地考察和结合曹操墓考古发现等相关的研究,认为北齐《龙骧将军杜达墓志铭》和北齐《王敬妃墓志》记载的“高陵”应指曹操高陵,而晋卿大夫赵盾葬所“九原”一语,更加佐证了“高陵崇栢”为曹操墓高陵,绝不会是指他人陵墓,更非安阳县西北的野马岗。同时,还对北齐《元世哲墓志铭》与曹操墓“西陵”的关系进行了探究。并就唐代《邺郡邺县故人柏君(道)墓志铭并序》记载的曹操墓等问题进行了进一步分析和实地考证。北齐墓志填补了曹操高陵方位在北朝没有记载的历史空白,为曹操高陵的真实性提供了新的佐证,具有重要的学术价值和理论意义。
On the basis of analyzing the records of classic books on the records of Gaoling Cao Cao, through the field investigation and the related research on the archaeological discoveries of Cao Cao, it is concluded that “the epitaph of General Long Duo” and “Gaoling ”Should refer to Cao Cao Gaoling, and Jin Qing doctor Zhao Dun funeral home “ nine original ”, more corroborated “ Gaoling Chong Bai ”for the tomb of Cao Cao Gao Ling, will never refer to other mausoleums, but also non-Anyang County Mustang Kong in the northwest. At the same time, the relationship between Northern Yuan Dynasty “Yuan Shizhe Epitaph” and Cao Cao Tomb “Xiling ” was also explored. And conducted further analysis and field research on the tomb of Cao Cao recorded in the epitaph and sequence of the epitaph of Bajun (Tao) in the ancient county of Tuan County. The epitaph of Northern Qi Dynasty filled the historical gap that Cao Cao’s Gaoling location did not record in the Northern Dynasty and provided new evidence for the authenticity of Cao Cao’s Gaoling mausoleum. It has important academic value and theoretical significance.