论文部分内容阅读
名誉和商誉在主体、评价内容、财产属性等方面均不相同,法人名誉权与商业诽谤制度在保护客体、法律属性、法律功能、侵权主体、侵权方式等方面也不相同。侵犯法人名誉权案件往往涉及公共利益,而商业诽谤案件不涉及公共利益,很多国家都在法律制度上将二者予以区别对待。我国在学术理论和法律制度上未对二者进行很好的区分,应当从区别适用归责原则、区别适用公共利益抗辩、区别适用真实性抗辩、承担不同赔偿责任四个方面对法人名誉权制度与商业诽谤制度加以完善。
Reputation and goodwill are not the same in the aspects of subject, evaluation content, property, etc. The legal reputation and commercial defamation system are also different in the protection of objects, legal attributes, legal functions, infringers and infringement methods. Cases of infringement of legal rights of reputation often involve the public interest, while cases of commercial defamation do not involve the public interest. Many countries discriminate between the two in the legal system. China does not make a good distinction between the academic theory and the legal system, from the distinction between the principle of imputation, the difference between the public interest defense, the difference between the application of the authenticity of the defense, to assume different liability of four aspects of the legal reputation system And commercial defamation system to be perfect.