这是我刊的新栏目。它与一九八七年同时降生。想写几句话,算是为新的生命“洗礼”。开设这个栏目。并非要追赶新派理论的潮流。文论界的种种“时髦”理论往往今日洛阳纸贵,不久便成了昨日黄花。这个道理我们明白。况且,我刊实为高校院墙内一井蛙,外界理论新潮的气势和力度我们领略甚少,实不敢滥竽充数。不过,由此认为我们轻视新思潮、新学派,那就错了。我们说新理论值得学习、研究,是因为它们能有真正的新意。时下国内不少被说成是最新式的观点和方法,依我们拙见。是海外早已过时的理论的翻新,有的甚至是很拙劣的照搬照抄。这种所谓的新理论我们不提倡。我们认为,真正的新意,在于它能帮助我们形成敏锐、成熟的见解,树立良好的治学之道,扎实、有效地赏析文学作品;它应是读来平易、清新、有味;读后使人思路清晰,感到确有收获。坦白地说,这就是我们为此栏选文的标准。我们将有选择地评介近年来西方文论界涌现的新思潮新学派,也将摘译半个世纪来被确认的西方经典文论著作。这一期刊登的是奥巴赫所著《模仿论》第十八章“在德·拉·木尔爵府”的片断,它是否符合上述标准,请读者评判。愿您喜欢、支持这个新辟的栏目。 This is my new column. It was born in 1987 at the same time. Want to write a few words, be regarded as a new life “baptism.” Open this section. It is not necessary to catch up with the trend of the new school theory. Literary circles of all kinds of “fashionable” theory is often Luoyang paper expensive today, and soon became the yellow flower. We understand this truth. Moreover, I actually published a well-frog in the college wall, the momentum and strength of the trendy theory of the outside world we have little experience, it is not enough. However, it is wrong to think that we should neglect the new trend of thought and new school. We say that the new theories deserve to be studied and studied because they can have real new ideas. Nowadays many of the domestic are said to be the most up-to-date perspectives and methods, according to our humble opinion. It is a refurbishment of the already obsolete theory overseas, and some are even very clumsy. We do not advocate this so-called new theory. In our opinion, the real new idea is that it can help us to form sharp and mature ideas, establish a good way of learning and appreciate literary works in a solid and effective manner. It should be easy to read, fresh and tasteful, Clear thinking, I feel really rewarding. To be honest, this is the standard we choose for this column. We will selectively comment on the new schools of thought and new schools of thought that have emerged in western literary circles in recent years. We will also extract semi-classical Western literary works that have been confirmed in half a century. In this issue, there is an essay entitled “Chapter 18 of the Imitation Theory” written by Obach, “at the palace of De La Moulin,” and whether it meets the above criteria or not, for the readers to judge. I hope you enjoy supporting this new section.