论文部分内容阅读
研究20世纪中国史学的辉煌与暗淡、骄傲与痛楚,都与探讨陈寅恪、郭沫若学术的成败得失、评论其人格的高下清浊直接相关。因为,在20世纪中国史学的代表性人物中,两位大师同为不可轻薄对待、值得特别关注的对象。这样说的涵义有二:其一,陈、郭二位的学术成就,在一般学术范式和具体研究成果两方面都代表了20世纪中国史学的最高水平;其二,陈、郭二位的个人命运,在相当意义上已成为20世纪中国史学历史命运的人格化体现。
Studying the splendor, dimness, pride and pain of Chinese historiography in the 20th century are all directly related to the discussion of the success or failure of Chen Yinque and Guo Moruo’s academic success and failure. Because, in the representative figures of Chinese historiography in the 20th century, the two masters are all objects that can not be treated lightly and deserve special attention. There are two meanings to this effect: First, the academic achievement of Chen and Guo both represented the highest level of Chinese historiography in the 20th century in both the general academic paradigm and the concrete research results. Second, the personalities of Chen and Guo In a considerable sense, fate has become the embodiment of the historical fate of Chinese historiography in the 20th century.