论文部分内容阅读
我国《涉外民事关系法律适用法》第44条除侵权行为地法外,新增了共同经常居所地和有限的意思自治的法律选择方法。本文以裁判文书为依据,对我国司法实践中第44条的适用情况进行归纳分析,并依据侵权冲突法法理,揭示我国侵权冲突法一般规则的“应然”要求,对于提升法院裁判质量具有重要意义。
In addition to Article 44 of the Law on the Application of Law Concerning Civil Relations Concerning Foreign Affairs, in addition to the law of infringement, the law adds a common method of legal choice of common habitual residence and limited autonomy of will. Based on the judgment documents, this article summarizes the application of article 44 of judicial practice in our country, and according to the jurisprudence of the law of infringement of conflicts of interest, reveals the “should” requirement of the general rules of the law of infringement in our country, It is of great significance.