论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较分析高等院校女生人格状况,为高校女生人格教育提供实证依据。方法:运用大学人格问卷(UPI)在湖南省的某理工院校对504名2005级女生进行人格测查,并抽取男生样本858名作为性别比较因素。结果:(1)有第一类人格问题的女大学生比例显著高于男大学生;女大学生UPI分数显著高于男大学生。(2)女大学生人格问题症状选择率排前列的项目依次为:在乎别人的视线,缺乏自信心,过于担心将来的事情,父母期望过高,情绪起伏过大。(3)非独生女与独生女的UPI分数不存在显著差异;农村生源女生UPI分数显著高于城镇生源女生;文科类女生UPI分数显著高于理工类女生。结论:女大学生人格问题比男生严重,农村生源女生人格问题比城镇生源女生严重,文科类女生人格问题比理工科女生严重;应高度重视女大学生尤其是农村生源女生和理工院校中文科类女生的人格健康教育,以优化她们的心理素质。
Objective: To comparatively analyze the personality status of female students in institutions of higher education and provide empirical evidences for their personality education. Methods: The college personality questionnaire (UPI) was used to conduct a personality survey on 504 2005 grade girls at a technical college in Hunan Province. A total of 858 boys’ samples were selected as gender comparison factors. Results: (1) The proportion of female students who had the first type of personality problems was significantly higher than that of male students. The UPI scores of female students were significantly higher than those of male students. (2) Female college students personality problems symptom selection rate of the top projects in turn are: care about others’ eyesight, lack of self-confidence, too worried about the future, parents expect too much, emotional ups and downs. (3) There was no significant difference in UPI score between non-only and only daughter; UPI score of rural student girl was significantly higher than that of urban student girl; UPI score of liberal arts girl was significantly higher than that of science girl. Conclusion: The personality problems of female university students are more serious than that of male ones. The personality problems of rural students are more serious than those of urban students. The personality problems of liberal arts students are more serious than those of science and engineering students. Female students, especially those from rural areas, Personality health education to optimize their psychological quality.