论文部分内容阅读
好的选择题不仅可以体现对学生知识与能力的综合考查,而且也是一份试卷的闪亮点。但是如果一个选择题有各种各样的问题,如缺乏科学性、逻辑性,不注重三维目标的考查的话,不仅不能达到考查学生知识的目的,而且会对学生的情感态度价值观等产生误导。笔者结合一个例子谈谈选择题命题中一些应该注意的问题。例:2012年1月31日,新科世界棋后侯逸凡在第十届国际象棋公开赛中完胜20年未输女选手小波尓加。中国首位世界棋后谢军断言:侯逸凡将成为世界女子国际象棋新主宰。她说:“小波尔加今年已经36岁了,而小侯还不到18岁,棋力正是长的时候。”谢军
Good multiple-choice questions can not only reflect the students a comprehensive examination of knowledge and ability, but also a bright spot in the paper. However, if a multiple choice question has a variety of problems, such as the lack of scientific, logical, or three-dimensional objective tests, it not only fails to achieve the objective of examining students ’knowledge, but also misleads students’ attitudes towards sentiments and attitudes. The author combines an example to talk about the multiple choice proposition should pay attention to some of the issues. Example: January 31, 2012, Shinco World Hou Qi Fan after the victory in the Tenth Chess Open did not lose the female athlete wavelet 尓 plus. Xie Jun, China’s first world chess, asserted: Hou Yifan will become the new dominator of world women’s chess. She said: “Little Boerga is 36 years old this year, and little Hou is less than 18 years old, chess is the long time. ” Xie Jun