四十多年前,郭沫若《甲申三百年祭》以其敏锐的触觉、深邃的思想和通俗的文字总结了明末农民战争的成功经验和失败教训,引起了毛泽东的高度重视,被作为中国共产党延安整风运动的重要文件,同时也成为马克思主义史学工作者的模文范章。亦正是由于《甲申三百年祭》涉及到历史研究与时代需要的关系问题,使这篇文章落下了“反科学”的把柄,成为郭沫若的著作中最具争论性的文章。今日重读《甲申三酉年祭》,拟就学术价值和政治意义两方面谈谈看法。一千百年来,中国历史上每一次农民战争都有文字记录。但是,不管是钦定正史的编撰者还是俾官 Over 40 years ago, Guo Moruo’s “300th Anniversary of Jiaxun” summed up the successful experience and failure lesson of the peasant war in the late Ming and the end of Ming Dynasty with his keen touch, profound thoughts and popular writings, arousing great attention from Mao Zedong and being regarded as Chinese Communist Party Yan’an rectification movement important document, but also become Marxist historians of the mold of the mold. It is precisely because the “300th Anniversary of Jiaxun” relates to the relationship between historical research and the needs of the times. This article has left the “anti-science” handle and became the most controversial article in Guo Moruo’s writings. Today, I read the “Year of the Ninth People’s Year of the Monkey King” and intend to talk about the academic value and political significance. For a thousand years, every peasant war in Chinese history has written records. However, neither the editors of the official history of the Kingdoms nor the officials