论文部分内容阅读
胡鸿杰在《论中国档案学的学术尊严》系列文章(详见《档案学通讯》2005年第5期、第6期,2009年第5期)中,详细系统地阐述了关于中国档案学学术尊严的问题,他在文章中说:学术尊严是学术研究发展到一定阶段的产物,也就是说,当学术研究的主体对自己研究的学科有了充分的认识,能够意识到学科理论体系的学术价值,并且愿意为此献身的时候,一门学科的学术尊严才有可能形成。这段话,我的理解有两点:中国档案学要想有自己的学术尊严,一是中国
In his series “On the Academic Dignity of Chinese Archival Science” (for details, see Archives Science Communication No. 5, 2005, No. 6, 2009, No. 5), Hu Hongjie expounds systematically and systematically the academic dignity In his article, he said: Academic dignity is the product of the development of academic research to a certain stage. That is to say, when the subject of academic research fully understands its own subject and can recognize the academic value of its theoretical system , And is willing to dedicate this time, the academic dignity of a subject is possible. This passage, I understand two things: China Archives want to have their own academic dignity, first, China