Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness, predictability and city of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correction of hyperopia. Methods 54 eyes of 35 patients with hyperopia ranging from+1.00 to + 6. 00 diopter(D) received a one-pass, multizone scanning excimer laser ablations using the Chiron Technolas Keracor 11 7C excimer laser and System ALK automated corneal shaper H-230.Data on uncorrected and hot corrected visual acuity, predictability, stability of refraction, and complications were analyzed. The average follow-up was 12 months. Results At 12 months, the average residual refraction was(+ 0. 29 ±0. 78)D. 45 eyes (83.3% ) were in the range of ±1. OD and 33 eyes(61. 1% ) were within the range of ± 0. 5D. 50 eyes (92. 6% ) had uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better and 34 eyes (63. 0% ) had 20/20 or better. 1 eyes (1. 9% ) lost 2 line of the best-corrected visual acuity and 2 eyes (3. 7% ) gained 2 lines or more. 2 eyes (3. 7%) had complaint of halos and 1 eyes (1. 9% ) had glare at 12 months. Conclusion LASIK can he used to treat hyperopia from + 1. 0D to + 6. 0D with good predictability and city. Primary and second hyperopia should he treated with different nomogram. some modification of the surgical algorithms and laser nomogram will help to improve predictability and stability of outcome. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness, predictability and city of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correction of hyperopia. Methods 54 eyes of 35 patients with hyperopia ranging from + 1.00 to + 6. 00 diopter (D) received a one-pass, multizone scanning excimer laser ablations using the Chiron Technolas Keracor 11 7C excimer laser and System ALK automated corneal shaper H-230. Data on uncorrected and hot corrected visual acuity, predictability, stability of refraction, and complications were analyzed. The average follow-up was 12 months. Results At 12 months, the average residual refraction was (+ 0.29 ± 0.78) D. 45 eyes (83.3%) were in the range of ± 1. OD and 33 eyes (61.1%) were within the range of ± 0. 5D. 50 eyes (92.6%) had uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better and 34 eyes (63.0%) had 20/20 or better. 1 eyes (1. 9% ) lost 2 line of the best-corrected visual acuity and 2 eyes (3.7%) gained 2 lines or more. 2 eyes (3. 7%) had complaint of halos and 1 eyes ( 1. 9%) had glare at 12 months. Conclusion LASIK can he used to treat hyperopia from +1 .0D to + 6. 0D with good predictability and city. Primary and second hyperopia should he treated with different nomogram. Some modification of the surgical algorithms and laser nomogram will help to improve predictability and stability of outcome.