论文部分内容阅读
从定性评价、单一指标评价、多属性评价、组合评价等4个方面构建学术期刊评价体系结构,分析学术期刊评价中存在的一些问题。认为:要慎重选用一些基于排序的评价方法和基于相关系数的评价方法;应该采取客观评价法进行组合评价,组合评价与多属性评价相结合将会取得进展;要注意评价的有效性与评价复杂性的辩证统一;各种评价方法可以互相补充,将长期共存下去。
This paper constructs the evaluation system structure of academic journals from four aspects: qualitative evaluation, single index evaluation, multi-attribute evaluation and combination evaluation, and analyzes some problems in the evaluation of academic journals. It is suggested that some sort-based evaluation methods and evaluation methods based on correlation coefficient should be carefully selected. The objective evaluation method should be used for portfolio evaluation. Combination evaluation should be made with multi-attribute evaluation. Attention should be paid to the effectiveness and evaluation of evaluation Sexual dialectical unity; a variety of evaluation methods can complement each other, long-term coexistence.