论文部分内容阅读
邵晋涵是清代乾嘉时期著名的史学家,乾嘉学人于经学则推戴震,于史学则推邵晋涵。但因其著述流传下来的不多,以至于身后声名萧索,后人鲜为关注。20世纪20~30年代之交,黄云眉编著《邵二云先生年谱》,开近代邵晋涵研究之先河。50~60年代之交,是谱虽经作者订补再版,然而仍是根据邵晋涵四卷本《南江文钞》和二卷残本《南江诗钞》编订,内容不够充实。为继承和发展前贤学术,兹据十二卷本《南江文钞》和四卷本《南江诗钞》,以及其他相关资料,对年谱补缺正误,以期更加完善。
Shao Jinhan is a well-known historian during the Qianlong and Jiaqing periods in the Qing Dynasty. Qianghu and Jia-Jia scholars advocated Dai Zhen in the Confucian classics and Shao Jinhan in the historiography. However, due to the small amount of his works handed down, the reputation behind him was so desperate that his descendants were little concerned. At the turn of the 20s and the 30s of the 20th century, Huang Yunmei edited The Chronicle of Shao Eryun and opened the first study of Shao Jinhan in modern times. At the turn of the 50s and 60s, though the book was revised and reprinted by the author, it is still based on four volumes of Shao Jinhan’s “Nanjiang Banknote” and two volumes of “Nanjiang Poems”, which are not sufficiently substantiated. In order to inherit and develop the predecessor of the scholarly science, hereby, on the basis of the twelve volumes of the Nanjiang Banknotes and the four volumes of the Nanjiang Poems, and other relevant materials, it is correct to make up for the anniversaries in the hope of further improvement.