论文部分内容阅读
在违约的情况下,有财产性的损失,也存在给对方造成精神利益损害,当前违约造成精神利益损害的情况呈上升的趋势,人们对精神的需求越来越多元化和越显深入,对违约造成精神损害诉求赔偿的案件,也常见于网络、报端等相关媒体,一方面说明维权的意识普遍增强,另一方面违约精神损害赔偿的合理性、正当性的意识也日渐深入人心,但实践中的理论、观点、甚至司法实践都是不统一的。以至于存在的现状是不论是理论界还是司法界对于违约精神损害赔偿的诉求,争议不断,处理和执行上不一致,不但冲击了法律的权威,不符合公平公正的价值理念,也会影响和谐社会的建设。
In the case of breach of contract, there is a loss of property, there is also the other party to cause mental damage, the current breach of the moral damage caused by the situation is on the rise, people’s spiritual needs more and more diversified and more in-depth, On the one hand, it shows that the awareness of safeguarding rights is generally enhanced; on the other hand, the sense of reasonableness and legitimateness of damages for breach of contract is also getting more and more popular, but practice The theory, opinion, and even judicial practice are not uniform. So that the existing status quo is whether the theory or the judiciary appeal for damages for breach of contract, controversial, inconsistent handling and implementation, not only impact the authority of law, does not meet the fair and equitable value concept, but also affect the harmonious society Construction.