论文部分内容阅读
章学诚曾说:“《汉志》以后,既无互著之例,则著录之重复,大都不关义类,全是编次之错谬尔。”(《校雠通义·辨嫌名》第五之一)过去学界也大都同意章氏的观点。但是,章氏的这一观点是值得商榷的,因为早在宋代的郑樵就已在其目录学著作中体现了互著之法。虽然在我们目前所能见到的郑樵遗著中未能见到有关互著的言论。但笔者认为有两点需提请注意:第一,郑樵一生著述甚丰,据厦门大学郑樵研究小组统计共84种,但流传至今的仅有五种残缺的遗作,在这点仅存的遗著中未能保存郑樵的全部学术思想。第二,在郑樵的《校雠略》中多次对
Zhang Xuecheng once said: “After” Han Zhi “, there is neither mutual examples, then the description of the repetition, most of the class does not care, are all the wrong editor of the wrong Seoul.” (“ One of five) in the past mostly agree with Zhang’s point of view. However, Zhang’s view is debatable, as Zheng Qiao, as early as the Song Dynasty, embodied the principle of mutualism in his bibliography. Although in the present we can see Zheng Qiao’s legacy can not see each other’s remarks. But I think there are two points to draw attention to: First, Zheng Qiao’s life is very rich, according to a total of 84 species of Zheng Qiao, Xiamen University, but there are only five kinds of incomplete works left in existence, The legacy of Zheng Qiao failed to save all the academic ideas. Second, many times in Zheng Qiao’s ”School Strategy" slightly