论文部分内容阅读
在探讨南宋修内司窑时,邵谔和王晋锡是两个关键人物。通过排比事迹,发现二人均无法确定与修内司窑有关,因此也不能以他们作为基本线索来推定修内司窑的性质与创建年代。根据老虎洞窑出土器物特征和窑业遗存反映的生产特点以及文字材料,确定其为修内司所置窑场当无疑议。其所生产的青瓷主要属于宫廷生活用瓷及陈设瓷,也不排除一些器物被另外用于祭祀,年代大致在12世纪中晚期至13世纪早中期。乌龟山窑与老虎洞窑年代相若,可能是修内司下辖的另一所青器窑。
In discussing the Southern Song Dynasty within the Division kiln, Shao and Wang Jinxi are two key figures. By comparing the deeds and discovering that both can not be identified as related to the repairing of the internal kilns, they can not be used as a basic clue to infer the nature of the internal kiln and its creation. According to the unearthed tiger kiln unearthed artifacts characteristics and the kiln remains reflected in the production characteristics and text materials, to determine the repair company to set the kiln farm when no doubt. The celadon produced by it mainly belongs to the court porcelain and furnishings porcelain, does not rule out some artifacts are also used for sacrifice, roughly in the mid-late 12th century to early 13th century metaphase. The Turtle Mountain Kiln is similar in age to the Tiger Cave Kiln and may be another Green Kiln under the jurisdiction of the Neiman Division.