论文部分内容阅读
一读了不少《老炮儿》的影评,收获甚少。话说在前,只有在普遍教育程度和科技水平偏低的社会,评论才会成为一个行业。当大家都识字、都能通过网络平台分享个人感受时,评论家的门槛基本上是低进到地里,凡是大脑完整之人都能评论。比如今早读到作家王路的《从老炮儿说说孔子的教化层次》,作者以《论语》中的“幼而不孙弟,长而无述焉,老而不死,是为贼”来指责《老炮儿》中反复穿插的茬架这一线索,隐晦地给六爷戴上了社会渣滓的帽子。这种看法甚是偏执,一,诸如六爷的胡同串子是切实存在于老北京的一个社会群体,在他们所出身的社会与时代背景之
Read a lot of “old gunner” movie critics, little gain. In the first words, comments will become an industry only in a society where the level of general education and science and technology is low. When everyone is literate and able to share personal feelings through the web platform, the threshold of the critics is basically lowered into the ground, and anyone with a complete brain can comment. For example, I read the writer Wang Lu’s “Era of Confucianism from the Old Gunners” this morning. The author uses the book of “Analects of Confucius” instead of grandchildren instead of grandchildren, “To accuse the” old gunner "repeatedly interspersed stubble this trail, vaguely to put on the social waste Liuyay hat. This view is very paranoid, one, such as Liu Ye Hutong string is actually exist in the old Beijing, a social group, in their background of society and the times