论文部分内容阅读
我国《反垄断法》施行至今,并没有出现针对著作权集体管理组织的反垄断审查或者相关纠纷,这和该法施行时间不长以及国家传统上对于著作权集体管理组织的行政保护力量过于强大有关。但是,实践中出现的一些与著作权集体管理组织有关的纠纷,其垄断成分也确实存在,尽管法院审理过程中并没有引用《反垄断法》及相关条文,但是未来适用《反垄断法》进行规范的可能性已经显现。通过考察欧美国家的审判实践发现,与著作权集体管理组织反竞争行为有关的纠纷从20世纪40年代开始延至今日,他们对著作权集体管理组织进行反垄断法规制成为共识,
Since the implementation of the Anti-monopoly Law in our country, there have been no antitrust censorship or related disputes against the collective management organization of copyright, which is not so long with the implementation of the law and the state’s traditional administrative protection of the copyright collective management organization is too powerful. However, some monopolies still exist in disputes concerning copyright collective management organizations that appear in practice. Although the court does not refer to the “Anti-monopoly Law” and related provisions, the future application of the “Anti-monopoly Law” The possibility has emerged. By examining the trial practice in Europe and the United States, it was found that the disputes related to the anti-competitive behavior of copyright collective management organizations have been delayed from the 1940s to the present. They have become the consensus on the anti-monopoly law of copyright collective management organizations,