论文部分内容阅读
清末民初,《书镜》(前身即《广艺舟双楫》)的作者康有为在近代及其以前的书法史研究仍然主要局限于碑帖消长史的领域时,沙孟海随即撰述《近三百年的书学》,提出了以近三百年的书学作为突破口,“是较有系统的作品”而被顾颉刚激赏有加。~([1])时过境迁,随之而来的便是近三百年书体史研究的兴盛,并且为近代书法历史发展的基本线索等问题的讨论提供了必不可少的研究条件。改革开放新时期以来,随着近代书法史研究的不断深入,有一部分学者似乎已不再满足于曾经辛勤耕耘过的园地,开始讨论寻找新的乐土和新
At the end of the Qing Dynasty and the beginning of the Republic of China, when Kang You-wei, the author of Book Mirror (formerly known as Guang Yi Zhou Shuangjian), still restricted his research on the history of calligraphy and painting in the modern times and in the past, Sha Menghai immediately wrote “ Hundred Years of Book Study ”, put forward by nearly 300 years of book study as a breakthrough, “ is a more systematic work ”Gu Jiegang was appreciated. It is the flourishing of book history research in the past three hundred years, and provides the essential research conditions for the discussion of the basic clues of the historical development of modern calligraphy. Since the new period of reform and opening up, with the deepening of the research on the history of modern calligraphy, some scholars seem to be no longer content with the hard-working fields and begin to discuss the search for new paradise and new