论文部分内容阅读
【目的】了解中国学术期刊对机构知识库存缴政策的态度。【方法】从《中国科技期刊引证报告》中选择326个样本,以电话通知的方式,确保他们进行线上问卷调查。【结果】回收有效问卷195份,回收有效率为65%强。其中,74.9%的期刊赞同论文存储到机构知识库中。说明他们对机构知识库存储和传播科技论文的态度和建议是正面的。【局限】总体调查规模有限,集中在质量较高、名声显著、已有期刊数字化基础的期刊,调查结论未必适用于全部中国期刊。【结论】多数调查对象赞成机构知识库存缴与传播论文,但建议今后提供期刊论文开放获取的权益咨询服务。
【Objective】 To understand the attitude of Chinese academic journals to the policy of institutional knowledge stockpile payment. 【Method】 A total of 326 samples were selected from “Citation Report of Chinese Sci-tech Periodicals”, by telephone, to ensure that they conducted online survey. 【Result】 195 valid questionnaires were collected and the effective rate of recovery was 65%. Among them, 74.9% of the journals agree with the papers stored in the institutional repository. Indicating that they are positive about the attitude and advice of scientific repository of institutional repository and dissemination of scientific papers. [Limitations] The survey is limited in scope, focusing on journals of high quality and notable reputation and having the basis of digitization of journals. The findings may not be applicable to all journals in China. 【Conclusions】 Most of the surveyed objects are in favor of the institutional stockpile of paid and disseminated knowledge, but it is suggested to provide advisory services on the rights and interests of open access to journal articles in the future.