论文部分内容阅读
【目的】探讨年龄与发育进程问卷(Ages&Stages Qestionaire,ASQ)和0～6岁发育筛查(DST)的测试结果的一致性。【方法】随机对门诊就诊的6～30个月229例婴幼儿同时进行适龄月龄相应的年龄与发育进程问卷(ASQ)和0～6岁发育筛查测验(全国城市常模,DST)测试。【结果】ASQ识别婴幼儿发ASQ异常率(27.1%)高于DST异常率(15.7%),差异有统计学意义。DST的智力指数(MI)与言语能区的一致率为93.0%,精细动作能区的一致率为87.8%,操作能力能区的一致率为87.3%。智力指数异常率与言语和精细运动能区异常率存在显著差异,与操作能力异常率无显著性差异。【结论】ASQ在识别婴幼儿发育落后方面,较DST更为敏感,建议基层作为适宜技术推广使用。
【Aim】 To investigate the consistency of test results between Ages & Stages Qestionaire (ASQ) and Developmental Screening (DST) 0-6 years old. 【Methods】 A total of 229 infants and young children aged 6 to 30 months from outpatient clinics were tested for Age-Related Age-Related Developmental Processes Questionnaire (ASQ) and 0-6-year-old Developmental Screening Test (National Urban Normal, DST) . 【Results】 The ASQ abnormality rate in infants and young children (27.1%) was higher than that in DST (15.7%), the difference was statistically significant. The coincidence rate of DST between intelligence index (MI) and verbal energy zone was 93.0%, that of fine motor zone was 87.8%, and that of operating ability zone was 87.3%. There was a significant difference between abnormal rate of intelligence index and abnormal rate of speech and fine motor energy area, but no significant difference with abnormal rate of operation ability. 【Conclusion】 ASQ is more sensitive than DST in recognizing the development of infants and young children. It is suggested that grassroots should be used as appropriate technologies.