作者在这篇文章中,鼓吹把资产阶级庸俗经济学和反科学的经济分析方法,运用于“不发达经济”的“研究”。他看到“不发达经济学”两种主要形式:即增长模型和增长阶段论都宣告了破产,于是提出自己的一套“概括”,企图“发现经济过程的因素”。他认为,“个人之间和集团之间经济才能和经济素质的差别对于经济发展有影响”,“气候和其它地理因素也起着重要作用”,这些主观唯心主义或唯地理论的解释,当然是错误的,其目的在于借此逃避真正决定经济发展的制度本身的问题。至于胡说什么“整个不发达世界目前最繁荣的地区是与发达世界已建立接触的地区……这些接触是发达国家的人力物力资源、技巧和资本到达不发达世界的通道”,那更是赤裸裸地为帝国主义和殖民主义势力侵入“不发达地区”打掩护。 In this article, the author advocates the application of bourgeois vulgar economics and anti-science economic analysis methods to the “underdeveloped economy” of “research.” He saw the two main forms of “underdeveloped economics”: that is, both the growth model and the growth stage theory declared bankruptcy. Therefore, he put forward his own set of “generalizations” in an attempt to “find out the factors of the economic process.” He believes that “differences in economic and personal qualities between individuals and groups have an impact on economic development,” and “climate and other geography also play an important role.” These explanations of subjective idealism or doctrine alone, of course Is wrong, with the aim of avoiding the problems of the system that really determines economic development. As for what nonsense “The most prosperous region in the entire underdeveloped world is the area where it has established contacts with the developed world ... these contacts are the means by which manpower and resources, skills and capital in developed countries reach the underdeveloped world.” To shield the imperialists and colonial forces from penetrating “underdeveloped areas.”