论文部分内容阅读
在英美法下,除了以对价为支持,一项允诺或行为还可依“禁反言”对当事人产生法律约束力。Swiss Singapore Overseas Enterprise Pte Ltd诉C银行厦门分行的信用证减价案,历时4年半,最终开证行胜诉。但该案仍存有两个重要且争议不断的问题:开证行在授权交单行索偿后是否有权再依UCP600第16条进行拒付?受益人在收到减额付款后反悔,要求开证
Under the Anglo-American law, in addition to the consideration as a support, a promise or act can be legally binding on the parties in accordance with the “Prohibition”. Swiss Singapore Overseas Enterprise Pte Ltd v C Bank Xiamen Branch of the letter of credit sale, which lasted four and a half years, the final issuing bank won the case. However, there are still two important and controversial issues in the case: Is the issuing bank entitled to protest against UCP600 article 16 after it authorizes the payer to pay the claim? The beneficiary, upon receipt of the deductible payment, regrets to open certificate