在我国司法实践中,一直存在着法官自觉或者不自觉地运用司法认知进行事实认定的情形,但由于缺乏明确的法律规范,同时理论研究也不够深入,导致法官在司法认知的使用中出现了种种问题。一方面,法官不愿进行司法认知或者不敢进行司法认知,另一方面又存在着任意进行司法认知的情形,司法认知这一有用工具并未发挥应有的作用。因此,针对当下形势的发展变化,结合我国的司法实践,准确界定司法认知的含义,并确立科学的使用规则,对于提升法官裁判水平,保证案件公正审判具有重要意义。一、司法认知的概念界定在诉讼活动中,根据证据裁判主义的基本原则,对 Judicial practice in our country, there has been a judge consciously or unconsciously the use of judicial cognizance of the fact that the situation, but due to the lack of a clear legal norms, and theoretical research is not deep enough, resulting in the use of judicial notice in the emergence of A variety of problems. On the one hand, judges are reluctant to carry out judicial recognition or are not willing to carry out judicial cognition. On the other hand, there is a situation of arbitrary judicial cognition. Judicial cognition is a useful tool which does not play its due role. Therefore, in view of the development and changes of the current situation and the judicial practice in our country, the accurate definition of the meaning of judicial cognition and the establishment of scientific rules of use are of great significance to enhancing the level of judges’ adjudication and ensuring fair trial of cases. First, the concept of judicial understanding of the definition of litigation activities, according to the basic principles of the evidence of referee, right