论文部分内容阅读
“圣相”李沆与“险薄”的梅询构成了历史书写中宋真宗时代的正反两种形象,众多笔记小说也敷衍出一个个展现梅询恶劣品行的“生动”故事。实际上,梅询与李沆的冲突主要因为:梅询直率敢言与李沆忍让退避的个人性情相异,梅询急切求变与李沆无为而治的政治理念相舛,梅询保卫灵州与李沆放弃灵州的军事策略相违。李沆所谴责的梅询、曾致尧、李夷庚皆是张齐贤一党,李沆指责梅询“险薄”的背后是宋真宗咸平年间李沆、张齐贤两个权力集团的明争暗斗。
“Saints ” Li Xun and “Thin ” Meixian constituted the positive and negative two kinds of images in the history writing in the Song and Jin dynasties era, many notes novels are also perfunctory one by one to show the bad behavior of the “ ”story. In fact, the conflict between Meijian and Li Kui was mainly due to the fact that Mei Kui was forthright in disagreeing with Li Xiong’s personal temperament of allowing her to evacuate. She asked for urgent change of political conceptions that Li Zhi did not do anything, State and Li emperor to abandon Lingzhou military strategy contrary. Li Mi condemned Meimei, Zeng Zhiyao, Li Yigeng are all Zhang Qi Xian a party, Li Yong accused Meimei “risk thin ” behind the Song Emperor Zhenping Li Ping, Zhang Qixian two power groups of flagrant infighting.