论文部分内容阅读
目前理论界对侦查程序的研究理性化色彩过重,学者们多对不同的刑事诉讼模式进行静态比较,得出何种模式相对优劣的结论,从而进行制度构建。这虽然有利于目标模式的选择,但不利于具有可操作性的制度设计。本文从我国社会转型时期的宏观背景出发,以这一特定时期所存在的对侦查机关完成打击犯罪和保障人权双重使命有重大影响的因素为切入点,进行系统审视,提出有限理性的理念,并以此为指导进行过渡性制度设计。
At present, the theoretical circles are overly rationalized in the research of investigative procedures. Scholars often compare the different modes of criminal litigation statically and draw conclusions about the relative strengths and weakness of the models so as to construct the system. Although this is conducive to the choice of the target model, it is not conducive to the operation of the system design. Based on the macro-background of the period of social transition in our country, this paper starts with a systematic examination of the factors that have a significant impact on the completion of the dual mission of criminal investigation and the protection of human rights during this particular period and puts forward the concept of bounded rationality As a guide to the transitional system design.