论文部分内容阅读
技术展现出来的独特“功能性”和“效率性”使得社会问题也频频向技术寻求答案,即“技术修正”。相对于社会工程倡导通过社会变革消除问题的做法,“技术修正”进路在处理社会问题上接受了人类固有的缺点,因而表现出了很大的简单性和可操作性;但是随着技术功能发挥层级的扩大,当“技术修正”在复杂的技术-社会系统中发挥作用时又表现出了很多的不确定性,这恰恰说明启蒙运动倡导的通过技术达致社会进步的观念只不过是一种佯谬而已。因此对待“技术修正”我们应该有合理的态度。
The unique “functionalities” and “efficiencies” exhibited by the technologies make social issues frequently seek solutions to technology, namely “technical amendments.” Compared with social engineering advocating the elimination of problems through social change, the “technical revision” approach has shown great simplicity and maneuverability by accepting the inherent shortcomings of human beings in handling social issues; however, with the The expansion of technological functions has shown a great deal of uncertainty when “technical amendments” play a role in complex technical-social systems. This shows precisely the notion of social progress promoted by the Enlightenment through technology It’s just a paradox. So treat “technical fix ” we should have a reasonable attitude.