一种观点认为 ,“毛周体制”说既无文献依据 ,也不能涵盖历史上我党领袖人物关系的实际情况 ,对党史研究利少弊多 ;另一种观点认为 ,“毛周体制”有三个支撑点 :其一是“毛周之间的相互选择” ,其二是周恩来对自己的准确定位 ,其三是周恩来的政治艺术 ,因而使“毛周体制”具有相对的稳定性 ;第三种观点认为 ,对“毛周体制”的提法应慎重 ,应从理性的高度论证毛泽东与周恩来的关系 ,尽可能用直接叙述的方法对毛周合作的运行机制作辩证的分析 In one view, the “Mao ZHOU system” said that there was neither a documentary basis nor a historical record of the actual situation of the party leaders’ relations, so there were fewer and no more disadvantages in the study of the history of the Party. Another view was that the “system of Mao Zedongs” There are three support points: one is “the mutual choice between the Mao and Zhou Dynasties,” the other is Zhou Enlai’s accurate positioning of himself; the third is Zhou Enlai’s political art, thus making the “Mao Zhou system” relatively stable; Three views hold that the formulation of the “system of Mao Zedongs” should be cautious, the relationship between Mao Zedong and Zhou Enlai should be argribed from a rational perspective, and a dialectical analysis of the operating mechanism of the cooperation with Mao Zedong should be carried out as directly as possible