论文部分内容阅读
汤志钧同志在《文物》1980年第7期发表了《<大同书>手稿及其成书年代》一文(以下简称汤文),根据在上海博物馆发现的康有为《大同书》手稿,进行了考证。我认为手稿的发现是重要的,汤文的考证也是有益的。但汤文却认定这个手稿“是最初属草时的稿本”,不可能是原稿被抄没后另行缮述的稿本,即在此之前没有更早的稿本了,1884年康有为没有撰过《大同书》,康说撰于此年,那是他倒填年月。对这种看法,我却不敢苟同。因为目
Comrade Tang Zhijun published the manuscript of “The Book of History and Prosperity” and his essay on the book (hereinafter referred to as Tang Wen) in the seventh issue of “Cultural Relics” in 1980, and conducted a research on the basis of the manuscript of “The Book of Datong” by Kang Youwei found in the Shanghai Museum. I think the discovery of manuscripts is important. Textual research on soup is also helpful. However, Tang Wen decided that the manuscript was “originally a manuscript of the grass,” and could not have been a manuscript written separately after the manuscript was copied, that is, there was no earlier manuscript before. Kang Youwei did not write in 1884 “Datong book,” Kang said in this year, that is, he filled years. I do not agree with this view. Because of the purpose