钱超英的澳华文学研究独具一格、卓有成效,开辟了一条可资借鉴的大路,尤其是在围绕流散文学的议题上,他别具问题意识,坚持本土与外来的双重辩证,也发展了流散与移民性的内在关联,引人思考。当然,其论述也存在一些问题,如果能够跨越时间限定,查漏补缺,借用“华语比较文学”等新理念,或许会有更大提升。 Qian Chaoying’s unique and well-researched Australian Chinese literature has opened up an avenue to learn from, especially on the issues surrounding the literature of flow and prosecution. He insisted on the dual dialectics of both native and foreign countries and also developed The inherent relationship between dispersal and immigration, drawing thought. Of course, there are some problems with its argument. If we can go beyond the time limit, find out some gaps and borrow new concepts such as “Chinese comparative literature,” there may be more improvement.