艺术贵在独创,艺术评论也贵在有独立的见解。前一段时期,许多报刊上的电影评论,不少是千篇一律、众口一辞的吹捧文章。某些影片明明质量很差,但其评论文章却吹得天花乱坠,似乎好得不得了。这是一种不正常的现象,读者对此极为不满和反感。这种一窝蜂似地吹捧之风,不仅对电影创作有害无益,而且亵渎了电影评论本身,降低了它的信誉和价值。中国电影评论学会会长、著名电影评论家钟惦棐同志对此深为忧虑,发出了“电影评论有愧于电影创作”的感慨;指出电影理论与电影实践状况相比,“处于很不相称的地位”,“理论落后于实际”(见《电影艺术》1982年9期)。的确,如何提高电影评论的质量,把影评工作搞上去?这是摆在每位影评工作者面前的一个必须认真思考和严肃对待的课 Art is original, art criticism is also independent in your own opinion. In the previous period, many movie commentary on newspapers and periodicals, many of which were stereotyped and all-out, touted the article. Certain films obviously have poor quality, but its commentary has been blown out, it seems incredibly good. This is an abnormal phenomenon, the reader is extremely dissatisfied and disgusted. This rush of swagger not only detrimental to filmmaking, but also desecrated the film review itself, reducing its credibility and value. Comrade Zhong Kui-chun, the president of China Film Critics Association and famous movie critic Zhong Fang, deeply worried about this and sent out the feeling of “movie commentary shameful on film creation”. He pointed out that the theory of film compared with the actual situation of the film is “very disproportionate Position ”,“ theory lags behind reality ”(see“ movie art ”1982 the nine period). Indeed, how to improve the quality of film reviews, to make film criticism work? This is placed in front of every film critic must seriously consider and take a class