最近,在《东方收藏》、《收藏快报》读到哑健先生的两篇大作:一是《<坦斋笔衡>所述“本朝”是指何朝》、二是《“汝窑为魁”的历史背景与“本朝”误读》,引起笔者的思考,到底是谁误读了《坦斋笔衡》?正是哑健先生自己。哑健先生在哪些方面误读,为什么会产生误读,正是本文要探讨的问题。对叶寘的《坦斋笔衡》的解读应抱正确态度。这里先谈一谈对待历史文献的看法和态度,笔者认为,对文史资料的采 Recently, in the collection of the Orient and the Collection Express, two articles of Master Dum Kin were read: First, what is meant by “” and “dynasty” mean “what” and “ Ru kiln as a leader ”historical background “ ”“ misreading ”, aroused the author’s thinking, in the end who misread the“ Tan Zhai pen ”? Where did Mr Mutem misread, why misunderstood, it is this article to explore the issue. The interpretation of “Tan Zhai Bi Heng” set by Ye Ye should have a correct attitude. Here to talk about the views and attitudes towards historical documents, the author believes that the collection of historical and cultural data