论文部分内容阅读
《罗马规约》第25条有关个人刑事责任原则的规定,在立法例上采纳了共犯区分制的模式,这主要是借鉴了以德国为代表的大陆法系的国内法做法。国际刑事法院的判例在区分共犯与正犯时,吸收了德国学者Roxin的犯罪事实支配理论,分别依据行为支配、意志支配和功能支配理论,将正犯分为直接正犯、间接正犯和共同正犯三种形式。《罗马规约》第25条的规定是国际刑法中个人刑事责任原则的新发展,它的贡献不仅在于重新定义了个人刑事责任的范围,更为重要的是首次以立法的形式在国际刑法中确认了共犯区分制,系统化了个人犯罪参与的形态,这对于国际刑法中认定个人刑事责任的理论和实践都具有重要的意义。
The provisions of Article 25 of the Rome Statute on the principle of individual criminal responsibility adopted the model of the system of division of accomplice in the legislation, which mainly draws on the domestic law practice of the civil law system represented by Germany. When discriminating between accomplices and principal offenders, the precedent of ICC absorbed the theory of the de facto crime of the German scholar Roxin and classified the principal offender into the direct criminals, the indirect criminals and the common criminals according to the theories of behavior dominance, will dominance and functional dominance respectively . The provision of Article 25 of the Rome Statute, which is a new development in the principle of individual criminal responsibility in international criminal law, contributes not only to the redefinition of the scope of individual criminal responsibility but, more importantly, for the first time in the form of legislation recognized in international criminal law The system of accomplice discrimination systematized the form of individual criminal participation, which is of great significance to the theory and practice of individual criminal responsibility in international criminal law.