论文部分内容阅读
苏格拉底式对话的显著特点,是以理性分析寻求事物的原因,以达到寻求事物的目的。在柏拉图的《欧梯佛洛》中,欧梯佛洛俨然是传统宗教伦理的代言人,而苏格拉底以“自知自己无知”出场,巧妙地运用“助产术”与欧梯佛洛谈论虔敬、天理和正义。在反讽、归纳、诱导和定义的过程中,苏格拉底分三层逐次阐明了自己的伦理观:神的好恶,不构成判断是非、善恶的依据;宗教伦理和世俗伦理二者之间相互依赖、相互补充,并存于一般伦理之中;神是一种精神存在。至此,苏格拉底的精神宗教伦理观,根本性地颠覆了传统的宗教伦理观,清除了神与人之间、宗教伦理与世俗伦理之间沟通、融合的障碍。
The salient features of Socratic dialogue are the reasons for seeking things rationally so as to seek for the purpose of seeking things. In Plato’s “Ou Teluo Fu”, Ou Teluo Luo seems to be the spokesman for traditional religious ethics, and Socrates to “know their own ignorance” appearance, clever use of “midwifery” to talk about Outi Foiluo piety, God and justice. In the course of irony, induction, induction and definition, Socrates clarified his ethical view in three layers: God’s likes and dislikes do not form the basis for judging right and wrong, good or evil; the relationship between religious ethics and secular ethics Rely on, complement each other, co-exist in the general ethics; God is a spiritual existence. So far, Socrates’ spiritual and religious ethics has fundamentally subverted the traditional religious ethics and removed the barriers between God and human beings, religious ethics and secular ethics.