论文部分内容阅读
贾根良认为,知识密集型服务活动可以同时达到激发创新和增加就业的双重目标,不仅是解决中国日益严重的知识性劳动失业的重要途径,而且有可能为中国化解长期无法得到解决的科技与生产相脱节的老大难问题开辟一条意想不到的新道路。陈劲则系统地概括了知识密集型服务的特征,提出了一套系统测度知识密集型服务业创新的新的指标体系,以期在传统的基于制造业的技术创新评价指标之外,为中国的知识密集型服务业的科学发展提供可行的指南。刘小军借鉴内部化理论,把外包看作外部化,对目前知识密集型服务活动的外包业务为什么会得到迅速发展在理论上进行了解释。刘书瀚从欧盟等目前为什么把知识密集型服务和服务创新作为政策支持重点入手,回顾了发达国家服务创新政策演变的三个阶段,指出作为中国新型工业化道路之核心的信息化在很大程度是以“服务化”为基础的,而不能只狭隘地理解为技术应用问题。
Jiagen Liang believes that knowledge-intensive service activities can simultaneously achieve the dual goals of stimulating innovation and increasing employment. It is not only an important way to solve the increasingly serious knowledge-based labor unemployment in China, but also may solve China’s long-term unsustainable phase of science and technology and production Out of touch with the crux of the problem to open up an unexpected new road. Chen Jin systematically summarizes the characteristics of knowledge-intensive services and proposes a new index system to measure the innovation of knowledge-intensive service industries systematically. With a view to building a new index system for manufacturing innovation in China, The scientific development of knowledge-intensive services provides a feasible guideline. Drawing lessons from the theory of internalization, Liu Xiaojun regards outsourcing as an externalization, which is theoretically explained by why the outsourcing business of knowledge-intensive service activities is rapidly developing at present. From the current reasons why the European Union and other countries take knowledge-intensive services and service innovation as policy support priorities, Liu Shuhan reviewed the three stages of the evolution of service innovation policies in developed countries and pointed out that the informationization as the core of China’s new-type industrialization is based largely on “Service ”, rather than narrowly understood as a technical application.